In a remarkable event on Friday, President Joe Biden of the United States hosted an unprecedented trilateral summit, uniting the US, Japan, and South Korea leaders at Maryland’s Camp David. With Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida and South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol in attendance, Biden convened this summit to solidify a shared security agenda among the trio to dissuade challenges from China and North Korea.
Today’s Unprecedented Summit: Gathering the leaders of the United States, Japan, and South Korea marks a historic milestone that holds immense potential to fortify US alliances in Asia and enhance the nation’s position in a fresh era of strategic rivalry. As revisionist autocratic powers like China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea increasingly collaborate to challenge the US-led rules-based global order, the United States has proactively aimed to assemble democratic allies across Europe and Asia, forming a united front to safeguard this order.
While achieving this has proven relatively smoother in Europe, where NATO stands as a well-established and effective multilateral alliance, the task has proven more intricate in the Indo-Pacific region. Here, the US operates through a network of bilateral alliances with countries such as Australia, Japan, South Korea, and the Philippines. In response, the United States has embarked on establishing fresh multilateral frameworks like AUKUS (Australia-United Kingdom-United States) and fostering initiatives like the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue, also known as the “Quad”.
Over the years, efforts have been made to stimulate deeper trilateral collaboration between Japan and South Korea, yet historical tensions between the two nations have posed challenges, affecting US national security strategy. However, a new administration in South Korea, marked by a novel foreign policy stance and reimagined US relations, has opened a historic window of opportunity.
US-Japan-South Korea Trilateral Summit at Camp David: 5 Key Takeaways
1. US, Japan, and South Korea condemn ‘dangerous and aggressive actions’ by China in the Trilateral Summit
The leaders issued a strongly worded collective declaration concerning China’s activities in the South China Sea, where China has laid claim to regions that, under international law, belong to other nations. They also highlighted China’s intentions for upcoming military exercises. The statement expressed firm opposition to any unilateral changes to the existing state of affairs in the Indo-Pacific waters, given China’s recent assertive and hazardous actions in support of its illicit maritime territorial assertions.
The three leaders signed a “Commitment to Consult” to coordinate responses to “regional challenges, provocations, and threats affecting our collective interests and security.” This is far from a pact to defend each other in the event of an attack, but it is almost certain to rile China.
Beijing has leveled accusations against the US, asserting that it seeks to establish a counterpart to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in the Asian region. Leading up to the summit, China’s state-operated Global Times cited experts who alleged that the trio of nations was shaping a “mini-NATO” framework, raising concerns over its potential negative impact on regional security. In the forthcoming regular briefing on Monday, China’s Foreign Ministry is expected to express its viewpoint assertively. However, the extent to which Japan and South Korea might face economic repercussions, considering their significant trade ties with Beijing, remains uncertain.
While public opinion in South Korea and Japan would probably lean against a treaty requiring mutual defense commitments, the close connection between these two nations is facilitated by the substantial presence of American military personnel stationed within their territories. These military alliances with the United States bind Japan and South Korea together, adding a unique dimension to the evolving geopolitical landscape
2. ‘Camp David’ Principles and Direct Line of Communication between US, Japan and South Korea
The three nations have agreed to establish a pattern of regular engagements involving top leaders, foreign ministers, and senior officials. Furthermore, they introduced a fresh communication channel colloquially termed a “hotline,” intended to facilitate swift direct communication.
The set of shared principles emphasizes adherence to the rule of law and the United Nations Charter, underscoring their commitment to addressing human rights concerns and climate change issues.
3. Collaboration in Military and Emerging Technologies between US, Japan and South Korea
The trio of nations commits to taking substantial strides to strengthen security cooperation among themselves, including a pledge to engage in consultations during times of crises, as outlined in their joint statement. This encompasses the initiation of a multi-year military exercise plan, which will take place annually. Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida revealed that the countries are also enhancing their coordination and integration efforts in the realm of ballistic missile defense.
4. US, Japan and South Korea Agree on New Supply Chain ‘Early Warning’ System in Trilateral Summit
The three countries agreed to create an “early warning system” to exchange information and coordinate responses to possible disruptions in global supply chains. The system will focus on being prepared for instances of economic coercion and will notify countries of potential shortages in critical goods such as batteries and essential minerals. President Biden emphasized the importance of this initiative.
An agreement to launch a pilot program for early warning systems for supply chain shortages will help reduce exposure to China. That may be a good compromise, as South Korea has been somewhat more hesitant than Japan about the Biden administration’s trade restrictions aimed at blocking China’s advances in several high-tech areas. South Korea’s largest semiconductor companies, Samsung Electronics Co., and SK Hynix Inc., both rely on China as the main market and manufacturing site for their memory chips.
5. The Trilateral Summit unequivocally prioritized tackling the imminent dangers posed by North Korea.
In their interactions with the press, the three leaders spoke resolutely about the threats posed by North Korea, including its nuclear capabilities. They affirmed their commitment to collaborative efforts aimed at countering these threats. The three leaders leave Camp David with plans to share real-time data on North Korea’s missile launches.
Their initiative involves the establishment of a rapid-response hotline, designed to facilitate swift sharing of intelligence, along with the commencement of comprehensive multi-domain military drills. Swift alignment becomes paramount due to the time-sensitive nature of the situation: a North Korean ballistic missile could potentially reach South Korea in a matter of minutes and Japan in under 15 minutes.
Under Yoon’s leadership, Japan and South Korea have jointly engaged in training exercises alongside US aircraft carrier groups when positioned off the peninsula. These drills have focused on intercepting missiles and conducting submarine hunts. By formalizing and enhancing this process, the three nations can significantly enhance their collective ability to coordinate and respond effectively in times of crisis.
China Slams Historic US, Japan and South Korea Trilateral Summit at Camp David
China is once again expressing its disapproval of the trilateral summit held at Camp David. China’s stance emphasizes that no nation should prioritize its own security at the cost of the security interests of others, as well as the broader regional peace and stability.
“The international community has its own judgment as to who is creating contradictions and increasing tensions,” Foreign Ministry spokesperson Wang Wenbin told reporters at a daily briefing on Friday.
“Attempts to form various exclusive groups and cliques and to bring bloc confrontation into the Asia-Pacific region are unpopular and will definitely spark vigilance and opposition in the countries of the region,” Wang said.
US National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan sought to push back on criticism from China that the US is seeking to develop a new Asia-Pacific NATO alliance, saying the partnership that is being strengthened “is not against anyone, it is for something. It is for a vision of the Indo Pacific that is free, open, secure and prosperous”
Read More On Geopolitics and Finance